A construction project produces thousands of documents in 30+ different shapes: drawings, submittals, points lists, certificates, factory reports, BMS screenshots. Vault reads them all, verifies them against your registers, and links every fact into one evidence graph your team can question.
| POINT | TYPE | RANGE | RESULT |
| SAT-04 | AI | 0-50°C | PASS |
| FSP-04 | AO | 0-100% | PASS |
| FLT-04 | DI | N/O | OPEN |
| VLV-04 | AO | 0-10 V | PASS |
| RANGE | READ | TOL ± |
| 0-50°C | 22.9 | 0.4 |
| REF | 23.0 | 0.1 |
These are published figures, not ours. They describe what escaped document errors already cost on projects like yours.
of project cost is lost to avoidable error in construction, around 21% once indirect costs and latent defects are counted.
GIRI · UK Get It Right Initiativeaverage cost to review and respond to a single RFI, from a study of over one million RFIs on 1,300 projects. Typical response takes ~10 days.
Navigant Construction Forumof RFIs stem from errors, omissions or ambiguities in the construction documents themselves.
Construction Industry Instituteof rework can be traced back to design- and engineering-related error, per the published rework literature.
LOVE ET AL. · REWORK STUDIESIndustry figures: GIRI research reports on the cost of avoidable error; Navigant Construction Forum, “Impact & Control of RFIs on Construction Projects” ($1,080 per RFI, ~9.9 RFIs per $1M of construction); Construction Industry Institute estimates cited therein; P.E.D. Love et al., rework cost literature.
Each capability gets its own deep dive as it ships. Drawing review is live today. Vault is the document layer of an AI-native readiness intelligence platform, proven on data center commissioning.
P&IDs and schematics read like a reviewer reads them: identity, revision chain, every element tagged, valve tables parsed, cross-references walked and cited.
Explore the feature arrow_forwardBMS points schedules read row by row, then matched to the graphics and alarm captures that prove them. The list and its evidence verified together, as one pass.
Calibration certificates, factory reports and registers read with their dates, ranges and tolerances, validated against the instruments and points they certify.
A commissioning testing timeline built from the dates, results and witnesses found in the reviewed documents, so progress is derived from evidence, not typed into a tracker.
Locations, power sources and served-by relationships identified in the documents and stored as typed links in the Turii knowledge graph, ready to be queried.
Dependency chains for power, cooling and controls derived automatically from the graph, feeding readiness views and risk analysis without manual mapping.
A dedicated AI agent per document type, tuned to its layout, language and failure modes, so a valve schedule and a factory report each get an expert reader.
Documents checked against the codes and standards you nominate, from building code clauses to project specs, with deviations citing the clause they trip.
Questions answered across the whole document set with sources side by side, from “which valves are open in mode B?” to “what is still blocking IST?”
Drawings are one of 30+ document types Vault reads on a commissioning project. The same pass that reads a flow diagram also reads the paperwork that has to agree with it, so the whole package answers as one.
Vault uses frontier models inside its pipeline. The difference is everything built around them: full-resolution document handling, your project records, and a rule that no fact enters the record without a source.
Still have questions? We’re here to help.
Book a Demo arrow_forwardDrawings shown are anonymised samples for demonstration.